@article{MAKHILLJEAS2019141017841,
    title = {HSS Competitive Rate of Interaction Coverage over Other AI-Based
Strategies with Less Number of Interactions},
    journal = {Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences},
    volume = {14},
    number = {10},
    pages = {3271-3276},
    year = {2019},
    issn = {1816-949x},
    doi = {jeasci.2019.3271.3276},
    url = {https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?issn=1816-949x&doi=jeasci.2019.3271.3276},
    author = {Jalal Mohammed,Waleed Noori and},
    keywords = {Interaction coverage,harmonic search strategy,T-way,combinatorial,AI-based strategy,action},
    abstract = {Artificial intelligence methods are adopted recently by several researchers for T-way testing. Whenever attainable, associate degree interaction is roofed at the most once underneath AI-based methods.
Priority is given once sampling the foremost optimum action in several AI-based methods. However, the live of interaction coverage drained metric per action is commonly neglected. This study seeks to check the systematic analysis through victimization the present computer science primarily based methods that consist of Tabu Search (TS), simulated hardening sturmarbeiteilung, Harmonic Search Strategy (HSS), Hill climb (HC), Particle Swarm improvement (PSTG) and nice Flood (GF) and as way as their rate of taking a look at coverage worries.}
    }