TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Implementation Languages on Software Complexity Measures of Quick Sort Algorithm
AU - , S.O. Olabiyisi AU - , R.O. Ayeni AU - , E.O. Omidiora 
JO  - Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
VL  - 3
IS  - 1
SP  - 118
EP  - 122
PY  - 2008
DA  - 2001/08/19
SN  - 1816-949x
DO  - jeasci.2008.118.122
UR  - https://makhillpublications.co/view-article.php?doi=jeasci.2008.118.122
KW  - Software complexity
KW  -quick sort
KW  -halsted complexity measure
KW  -cyclomatic complexity measure
AB  - In this study, we apply different software complexity measures to Quick sort algorithm. Our intention is to study what kind of new information about the algorithm the complexity measures (Halstead’s volume and Cyclomatic number) are able to give and to study which software complexity measures are the most useful ones in algorithm comparison. The results explicitly show that Quick sort has the least Halstead’s Volume, Program Difficulty and Program Effort when programmed in Assembly language.
ER  -