Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
117
Views
12
Downloads
A Comparative Study of Dermis Fat Graft vs Non Integrated Implants as Primary Orbital Implant Following Enucleation
M.V.D.L. Satyanarayana, N. Kasturi Bai, M. Kiranmai, Asma Shaik and M. Sushmitha
Page: 453-456 | Received 16 Jun 2024, Published online: 30 Jul 2024
Full Text Reference XML File PDF File
Abstract
The aim of our study is to compare the outcome of nonintegrated implants Vs dermis fat graft as primary implant in terms of prosthesis motility, retention, orbital volume replacement after enucleation. After obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee, retrospective analysis of the records of 50 patients who underwent enucleation with primary orbital implant during the period of January 2023‐May 2024 was done. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A included 25 patients who underwent with Dermis Fat Graft as implant whereas Group B included 25 patients who underwent Enucleation with Non integrated PMMA Orbital implant. Enucleation was performed for 28 patients with painful blind eye, 14 patients with open globe injury and 8 patients with anterior staphyloma. The mean age of patients undergoing surgery was 55.5 years. The results of both the groups with DFG Implant and PMMA orbital implant are comparable in terms of orbital volume replacement and motility of implant. Extrusion rate was nil for both the groups. Primary orbital reconstruction with DFG is better choice in terms of motility and implant retention. But in terms of orbital volume replacement non integrated implants are preferred choice.
How to cite this article:
M.V.D.L. Satyanarayana, N. Kasturi Bai, M. Kiranmai, Asma Shaik and M. Sushmitha. A Comparative Study of Dermis Fat Graft vs Non Integrated Implants as Primary Orbital Implant Following Enucleation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.36478/makrjms.2024.8.453.456
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.36478/makrjms.2024.8.453.456