Research Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: Online 1993-6095ISSN: Print 1815-9346
Abstract
This study addresses the comparative analysis of muscle adaptation and injury prevalence in athletes and non‐athletes. Given the distinct physical demands placed on athletes, understanding these differences is crucial for developing targeted injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies. The primary aim is to evaluate the differences in muscle adaptation between athletes and non‐athletes. Additionally the study seeks to compare the incidence and types of muscle injuries in both groups, hypothesizing that athletes, due to their rigorous training, might exhibit both advanced muscle adaptation and a higher rate of certain types of injuries. A cross‐sectional design was employed, with a total sample size of 200 participants (100 athletes and 100 non‐athletes). Participants were recruited through sports clubs and community centers. Standardized assessments were conducted to evaluate muscle adaptation, including muscle strength, endurance and flexibility. Injury data were collected through self‐reported questionnaires and verified with medical records. Preliminary analysis indicates that athletes show significantly higher muscle strength and endurance compared to non‐athletes. However, athletes also reported a higher incidence of specific muscle injuries, particularly in areas subjected to repetitive stress. Non‐athletes showed a lower overall injury rate but a higher prevalence of injuries resulting from everyday activities. The findings suggest that while athletes exhibit enhanced muscle adaptation, they are also at a higher risk for certain muscle injuries. This underscores the need for tailored injury prevention programs for athletes. For non‐athletes the lower injury rate but higher prevalence of everyday activity‐related injuries indicate a potential area for public health intervention.
How to cite this article:
A. Sivapriy and K.A. Malar Vannan. Muscle Adaptation and Injury: A Cross Sectional Study of Athletes and Non‐Athletes.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/10.59218/makrjms.2024.4.88.93
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1815-9346/10.59218/makrjms.2024.4.88.93