Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

125
Views

0
Downloads

Comparative Study of Implementation Languages on Software Complexity Measures of Quick Sort Algorithm

S.O. Olabiyisi , R.O. Ayeni and E.O. Omidiora
Page: 118-122 | Received 21 Sep 2022, Published online: 21 Sep 2022

By Research Area

Medicine & Public Health Life Sciences Engineering Mathematics Biomedicine Physics Chemistry Computer Science Earth Sciences Social Sciences Business and Management Psychology Materials Science Economics Education Environment Philosophy Statistics Law Political Science and International Relations Pharmacy Dentistry Energy Linguistics Geography Finance Criminology and Criminal Justice Medicine Cultural and Media Studies History Architecture / Design Literature Biomedical Sciences Religious Studies Education & Language Food Science & Nutrition Public Health

By Volume and Issue

Abstract

In this study, we apply different software complexity measures to Quick sort algorithm. Our intention is to study what kind of new information about the algorithm the complexity measures (Halstead’s volume and Cyclomatic number) are able to give and to study which software complexity measures are the most useful ones in algorithm comparison. The results explicitly show that Quick sort has the least Halstead’s Volume, Program Difficulty and Program Effort when programmed in Assembly language.

How to cite this article:

S.O. Olabiyisi , R.O. Ayeni and E.O. Omidiora . Comparative Study of Implementation Languages on Software Complexity Measures of Quick Sort Algorithm.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36478/jeasci.2008.118.122
URL: https://www.makhillpublications.co/view-article/1816-949x/jeasci.2008.118.122